Skip to content

The East Texas Tar Sands Pipeline You Don’t Know

April 23, 2012

                                                                                         TAR SAND

                                                            LAKE LAVON near Wylie, Texas

The Seaway pipeline, a 36-year-old oil and gas pipeline, is being “repurposed” to carry a poisonous mix of chemicals and tar sands bitumen up to 20 times more toxic than traditional crude. Unless we act, the poison blend will flow across Richland Chambers Lake and under tributaries leading to Lavon Lake — major water resources serving Dallas and Fort Worth — starting May 17.

Since a previous attempt by the same company, Enbridge Inc. of Canada, to repurpose a 43-year-old pipeline in Michigan resulted in one of the most expensive pipeline spills in U.S. history — a spill that still hasn’t been cleaned up after 20 months — residents have every reason to be troubled about what may be flowing through Seaway soon.

Tar sands are often described as a dirtier form of crude oil and are more like asphalt than petroleum. It is mined, not drilled and pumped like oil. It is solid at ambient temperatures and far more acidic than crude oil.

To push tar sands through a pipeline, chemical diluents must be added. Like some fracking companies, Enbridge and other pipeline operators have refused to disclose what’s in the diluents, saying that the toxic mix is proprietary. What we know, or learned from tar sands pipeline spills, is that the blend is heavy in benzene, a toxin hazardous at just 6 parts per billion, and many other chemicals that are far more deadly than anything in a traditional oil pipeline.

In other words, tar sands ain’t your grandaddy’s crude.

Even with these toxic diluents, tar sands bitumen is so thick and heavy that pipelines built for it typically operate at pressures above 1,200 psi. For comparison, a standard sweet crude pipeline will operate below 150 psi, and an oil pipeline is considered at high pressure at 500-600 psi.

The higher the pressure on the pipeline, the greater the risk of a spill and the more significant a spill is likely to be. One spill on the Keystone I pipeline shot tar sands six stories into the air. Enbridge has announced plans to “twin” an ultra-high-pressure line alongside the aging Seaway line that could have similar problems.

But Enbridge already has a far more impressive tar sands spill on its record. The company repurposed the 43-year-old Line 6B to carry tar sands across Michigan. Operating below the pressure allowed under the Seaway permit, Line 6B ruptured and poured more than 1 million gallons of the tar sands blend into the Kalamazoo River in July 2010.

To date, the Enbridge spill on the Kalamazoo is one of the most expensive pipeline spills in U.S. history.

One reason it has been so expensive is that tar sands bitumen is heavier than oil and sinks in water. This makes cleanup almost impossible, so it’s little wonder that the Kalamazoo cleanup has exceeded $700 million (and climbing). A large section of the river is still off limits, and now the company faces a whistle-blower lawsuit from a worker with evidence that Enbridge was covering up the spill instead of cleaning it.

Texas water supplies are too precious and limited to risk these kinds of accidents. Seaway also crosses the Trinity and Carrizo Wilcox aquifers, passing through seven counties in D-FW’s regional water planning district.

Both the EPA and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration have roles to play and should act quickly to evaluate Seaway’s safety. But they won’t — unless you tell them to. It’s critical that an Environmental Impact Statement be done for this pipeline. Remember:

This is a pipeline of poison that was never designed to handle heavy tar sands bitumen.

The risk to Texas water supplies is too high and cleanup is virtually impossible.

Seaway won’t create any new jobs, and the project’s announcement has already raised the price of oil

Texans are renowned for fighting over water. With a pipeline of poison threatening Lavon Lake and Richland Chambers, now is a good time to live up to that reputation.

Tom “Smitty” Smith is director and Trevor Lovell the environmental program coordinator of Public Citizen’s Texas office. They may be contacted through tlovell@citizen.org.

DALLAS NEWS LINK

5 Comments leave one →
  1. April 23, 2012 10:27 am

    ‎”Already eleven people have died in one small trailer court near the Kalamazoo River from illnesses that they and their doctors believe were triggered or worsened by the tar sands that flowed past their homes and soiled the river banks.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/riki-ott/gulf-oil-spill-anniversary_b_1440704.html?utm_source=Alert-blogger&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Email+Notifications

  2. That One Guy permalink
    April 26, 2012 4:03 pm

    I’d like to see a state law mandating a minimum fine in case of a spill – something on the order of $500 per gallon spilled. This would be in addition to requiring the company to pay for all cleanup costs, with all monies being paid prior to allowing the resumption of use of the pipeline that failed.

    This might not prevent spills but it would certainly lessen the chance that these firms would repurpose old infrastructure in a high risk manner.

    Seems like a reasonable law to me. These companies always put out PR about how what they’re doing won’t cause any problems. Let them put their money where their mouths are.

  3. April 29, 2012 8:19 am

    Perhaps one way to slow things down is for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to apply the brakes to Seaway Crude Oil Pipeline Company’s tariff proposals. It appears that that is the last hurdle the company needs to pass before it begins its transport of tar sands crude.
    Please sign the petition:
    http://www.change.org/petitions/kimberly-d-bose-secretary-federal-energy-regulatory-commission-reject-seaway-crude-pipeline-company-s-proposed-tariffs

  4. July 17, 2012 5:15 pm

    A group of concerned citizens are going to the Rowlett CityCouncil to give information and suggestions to the City Council tonight, 7:30pm. There will be about 12 people speaking about the different aspects of the Pipeline, and a resolution will be presented to the council on this matter.

Trackbacks

  1. Threats to Arlington drinking water from shoreline drilling and tar sand transport | City Council Candidate, Kim Feil Forum

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: